RIABiz

News, Vision & Voice for the Advisory Community

RIABiz

Why the LPL-Schwab merger rumor making the rounds makes more sense the harder you look

The Boston- and San Francisco-based companies each lead independent channels and redundancies are scarce

4 min read
By Brooke Southall November 18, 2016Updated: November 1, 2022
no description available
Citi's Bill Katz spoke out Thursday to quell rumors about Schwab buying LPL, but only with soft logic.

LPL Financial's shares leapt higher yet again Thursday to finish above $40, up from about $31 as recently as Nov. 3.

This time, it had Chuck to thank.

The Charles Schwab Corp. is the latest company rumored to be in the mix as a buyer for the Boston-based broker-dealer for 14,000 advisors. See: LPL shares spike despite CFO downplay of buyout prospects as CEO Mark Casady reveals 'large programs' at banks are kicking LPL tires

Though the rumor published by StreetInsider was quashed by prominent analyst Bill Katz at CitiGroup, who researches both companies, the shares didn't seem to mind and remained at a 4% premium from where they left off at Wednesday's market close.

Katz assured the markets that Schwab will make no such big bets and that LPL might command a $4 billion price tag. Company execs at San Francisco-based Schwab, which has a $49 billion market capitalization, or 10-fold LPL's, will concentrate on investing capital in bank-sweeping technology and niche acquisitions -- if it is true to its promises, Katz added in press reports. See: Schwab launches biggest RIA-targeted price war in years -- but TD and Pershing say they won't play along

Yet the prospect of a Schwab-LPL merger is almost absurdly tempting, observers say. Each company commands the lion's share of market share in their respective advisory channels. Schwab owns the RIA business with about $1.2 trillion of assets from 7,000 RIA firms and LPL owns the independent rep market with $485 billion from its 14,000 firms. See: Why exactly a $2.2 billion RIA hybrid abruptly dumped LPL for Securities America -- and Schwab, Fidelity and TD Ameritrade.

Mike Durbin is putting his stamp on Fidelity as an RIA custodian for asset-flush breakaways
Related· Oct 25, 2011

Mike Durbin is putting his stamp on Fidelity as an RIA custodian for asset-flush breakaways

Filling in gaps

In addition to the surface gleam, the compatibility factor has depth in the details.

LPL has so much of what Schwab doesn't have -- starting with a broker-dealer and a pure B-to-B brand. There's more. LPL is self-clearing, which would give Schwab a footing on that front now enjoyed by Fidelity Investments with National Financial and BNY Mellon with Pershing. LPL has budding bank channel business and OSJs. See: LPL restores OSJ rights to $35-billion AUA super-rep that just kept growing during its three-year ordeal.

Tim Welsh: You shouldn't expect to see LPL brokers in Schwab branches. It's anathema to Chuck's ethos.

Schwab would also fill in some wide LPL gaps. Schwab has a retail brand and the ability to custody RIA assets without charging fees to cover compliance. Schwab has branches. It also has a bank where it can sweep loose cash from advisor clients to generate fat profits. Too, Schwab has its own robo that can be sprinkled like pixie dust to digitize the customer experience. See: Adam Nash makes direct 'CEO-to-CEO' plea to Schwab to rethink its robo

LPL's deal with San Francisco-based FutureAdvisor, by contrast, may limit how much repurposing it can do with such technology. See: LPL unveils BlackRock's FutureAdvisor as its robo partner -- albeit with LPL model portfolios

Why a $1-billion Fidelity RIA is placing LPL at the heart of its 401(k) business
Related· May 22, 2013

Why a $1-billion Fidelity RIA is placing LPL at the heart of its 401(k) business

Each has 401(k) businesses that serves different echelons of the market. See: Why a $1-billion Fidelity RIA is placing LPL at the heart of its 401(k) business

Anathema ... but possible

But as good as it all sounds, Tim Welsh, former Schwab Institutional marketing director and currently president of Nexus Strategy, a consultancy in Larkspur, Calif., says that Katz is likely right -- if for the wrong reasons.

"This reminds me of all the times we looked at buying a broker-dealer when I was at Schwab," he says. "The head of advisory would always say: It's like Disney selling porn."

Nomura analyst Steve Chubak counters that by telling Barron's that “Trump tailwinds could render a deal more viable,” alluding to the possibility that President-elect Donald Trump’s could undo DOL’s new fiduciary rule. He adds in a research note: "There is growing expectation that the DOL rule could be softened under the new GOP (see recent comments from Hensarling), which would remove one of the hurdles to an LPLA takeout."

Welsh allows that times have changed -- hence the jarring aspect of that metaphor -- from 2000 when LPL brokers were more likely to be pushing product than they are today. See: How LPL's CFO answered the Cetera question at Morgan Stanley Financial's conference

And he can see the obvious synergies.

"It would give Schwab distribution and LPL a brand," Welsh says. "But you shouldn't expect to see LPL brokers in Schwab branches. It's anathema to Chuck's ethos and what he's been railing against."

But another source speaking on the condition of anonymity says Schwab already struggles enough with channel conflict between RIAs and its branches. Tossing 14,000 additional LPL advisors into that mêlée would assure  more discord than Schwab CEO Walter Bettinger has the stomach for.

Rely on RIABiz? Tell Google.

Naming us a preferred source puts our reporting first in your Top Stories and AI Overviews. Takes one click, and only you see the difference.

Make us a preferred source on Google

On the record

Be an expert voice.

Become an expert voice

Anonymous

Or tell us without your name.

Send an anonymous tip
Entities in this article
Topics
Department of Labor Rule


RIABiz Directory

The Industry Sourcebook for RIAs

   |    LISTING


RIABiz Directory
sponsored by

Directory Sponsor Logo