Morningstar buys standalone rebalancer to fulfill its all-in-one vision by getting Sheryl Rowling to cash out and go back to RIA
This way M'star gets to intellectually fuel trades but execute lift-off without an awkward hand-off out of its own software zone
Envestnet just named an ESG head to meld 'wellness,' 'The Intelligent Financial Life' and 'sustainable investing' into a single nirvana -- that starts outside of the product realm
Ron Ransom earned CEO Bill Crager's trust as chief business development officer and now will define how Envestnet conducts itself as a global citizen and vendor of wellness.
July 27, 2022 – 2:27 AM
Tricia Rothschild is out at Apex in run-up to $4.7 billion IPO as an ex-Goldman exec assumes her day-to-day role and two ringers fill big jobs
The ex-Morningstar exec leaves president role after one year as ex-Google and ex-Nasdaq talents step into new CTO and CMO posts.
July 14, 2021 – 7:04 PM
Envestnet and Edmond Walters end odd couple 'Apprise' relationship with buyout, but leave open the door to jointly pursue RIA-to-entrepreneur dashboard... later
The MoneyGuidePro owner and eMoney founder execute clean break with Apprise IP rebranded as 'Wealth Studio.' Walters off to the races with a startup and vague promise to collaborate later.
April 6, 2021 – 12:50 AM
Envestnet turns to former FIS executive -- and replaces a CTO -- to help shape up the firm's disparate offerings into a unified whole around the concept of 'wellness'
The Chicago outsourcer gets Donna Peeples to harmonize products and marketing to move beyond the 'TAMP' label as Orion contends for market share with Brinker added.
November 10, 2020 – 2:45 AM
See more related moves
Glad I did not waste our firm’s money on this. We were about to pull the trigger and go with this as our rebalancing solution. What happens now to legacy client’s? So you now have to buy in to Morningstar Advisor’s stand alone product to utilize this going forward? What about advisor’s that use a watered down version via their broker/delaer arrangements? This article is very good in one sense that it sounds the bell and alerts the industry, but very lite on specifics.
Many of the statements in this article do not reflect what is actually going on. tRx will continue to be open to ALL advisors no matter which portfolio accounting software is being used. For full, factual information, please see my InvestmentNews article at http://goo.gl/RIe6aN.
The missing link that technological innovators miss is prudent process in support of fiduciary duty (authenticated back to statute) which is different than financial planning. This is the key to (1) professional standing, (2) simplifying advisory services and fiduciary duty into an integrated expert advisory solution, and (3) streamlining cost. which are essential for continuous, comprehensive counsel required by statute on every recommendation the advisor has ever made. All the necessary components exist, they just have not been formulated in an easy to use manner. The industry must rethink its support infrastructure focusing more on managing investment and administrative values in the client’s best interest rather than product distribution in the b/ds best interest. The emphasis seems to ignore the best interest of the investing public.
As Brooke mentioned in the article—-We will definitely continue our support for legacy TRX users though the Stand-Alone TRX Product, as well as through integrations with other portfolio management systems.
I believe we have a strong track record of being “open” and doing what is best for advisors and we will continue to work with those firms who share Morningstar’s Mission of helping advisors produce better outcomes for their clients.
We believe that TRX has a huge role to play in this endeavor and we are excited to bring these advanced capabilities to the broader market.
Thank you Sheryl & Mike. Looks like tRx is back on the table. Winks I’m unsure what your speaking about. I think your taking the “fiduciary” label a bit too far here. Technology costs money. They are obviously going to leave it as a stand-alone product and initiate a full integration product. It would be great if we could get everything for pennies on the dollar or in an un-biased or un-sponsored (by a b/d for instance) format. It just won’t happen. The industry is too fractured and they’re constantly competing for every advisor’s dollar. All we adviors can do is do the due diligence, try to pick and use the best product that compliments our practices and try to keep fees within reason. Beyond that, our hands are tied to the “industry” in my opinion.