RIABiz

News, Vision & Voice for the Advisory Community

RIABiz

Why unconstrained bond fund skepticism is justified (think 2008, not 2013) and why RIAs should say: None of the above

Brent Burns counter-dissects the Sanders Wommack vivisection of an article written by experts from LPL and Google

Admin:
no description available
Brent Burns: A bond fund is simply a mutual fund that happens to own bonds (or in many cases derivatives) with no obligation to pay back anything.

Related Moves

Vanguard Group shows up as 'alpha' disciple with two new fixed-income fund launches as it surpasses PIMCO's $2 trillion with ex-Goldman Sachs partner now calling the shots

The $8 trillion Malvern, Pa. manager owns beta investing, but RIAs are demanding higher income -- hence market timing and cherry picking -- from their fixed-income allocation.

August 10, 2021 at 11:46 PM

Jeff Mello is latest to join eMoney's talent exodus but CEO Ed O'Brien says it's healthy renewal at a firm that added several hundred people since Fidelity bought it

The ex-Goldman Sachs director of strategy and planning at eMoney joins a growing list of departures exacerbated, sources say, by Fidelity putting a wobbly performance reporting software project -- and staff -- on its plate

February 28, 2020 at 11:09 PM

Pete Giza and Damon Deru go for Holy Grail of portfolio rebalancing with software that shuffles stocks, bonds... and asset classes; Believe it?

The RedBlack and TradeWarrior executives see old systems as 'archaic' yet know that the Black Diamonds, Morningstars, Orions and Tamaracs see rebalancing as a loss leader

June 11, 2019 at 9:49 PM


Mentioned in this article:

Investment & Wealth Institute
Association
Top Executive: Sean Walters

Morningstar, Inc.
TAMP
Top Executive: Joe Mansueto




FAA

FAA

October 17, 2014 — 7:00 PM

I certainly don’t mean to be a nudge on this because I think what the writer is saying makes sense but…

Citing 2008 as the poster child for risks of unconstrained bonds funds is, in my view, not a real good example. The reality of it is that in 2008 everything correlated…in a bad way. It wasn’t just unconstrained bonds. Also- I would imagine that if there was any spread product in the dedicated strategy cited- those bonds didn’t do so well either.

To me the real discussion should be around the utilization of SMBA- separately managed bond accounts vs. mutual funds. So whether it is a dedicated approach, active, spread yada yada- a separately managed account makes more sense for reasons the writer mentioned. It is doable for some but not everyone.

Lastly- dedicated or immunized investment strategies are not new- been around for quite a while.

RIABiz Directory

The Industry Sourcebook for RIAs

   |    LISTING


RIABiz Directory sponsored by:

Directory Sponsor Logo