News cycles are fleeting so pick your battles wisely

November 1, 2011 — 3:43 AM UTC by Guest Columnist Jason Lahita


The new reality for RIAs is that every day feels like a crisis. As markets swing wildly and moods shift from glee to gloom and back again, clients are scared – you might even say terrified – and their fear is infectious. How do you position yourself well in the face of so much chaos? Bullish or bearish, how do you walk the tightrope?

You need to choose your words carefully, and most of you do. But sometimes, mistakes are made. Sometimes the wrong thing is said, or done. Even innocent, explainable errors can quickly turn into PR monsters of nightmarish proportions. So how do you gauge your particular “crisis,” and what can you do about it when it rears its gruesome head?


Most of you who go before the media are practicing PR in times of crisis. It is important to make the distinction between this and “Crisis PR.”

Depending on one’s perspective and personal experiences, crisis can have many meanings. I spent some time in the U.S. Navy, where crisis meant our aircraft carrier had run over an F-18 that had been improperly launched from the flight deck. The pilot was fine, but wet and a half-inch shorter on getting back to the ship (I’m speaking literally – pilots get only three ejections in their career, max, due to spinal compression). He may have used strong language when referring to the situation. Recently I’ve experienced what I would define as a family crisis that makes a lot of what I worry and stress about on a daily basis seem ridiculous. So I try to keep all of this in perspective when considering whether something is truly worthy of the “crisis” label.

The fact is that is that all crises are relative. If you are getting spit-fire roasted by a journalist who seems to despise you, you’ve got yourself one sort of crisis. If you contributed money to Occupy Wall Street following Goldman’s withdrawal only to find yourself speaking for your B-D against their wishes – and Goldman managed your B-D’s IPO, then that’s a crisis of a different color – particularly if the reporter loved your quote about how the protesters are “just as inarticulate as my clients,” and it was highlighted it in the headline.

To respond or not to respond?

My definition of a crisis is anything that, once out for public viewing, could cause any sort of damage to your business. So what’s the right way to approach a crisis? First, assess the damage. It is easy to panic, to overreact and assume the sky is falling but often things aren’t as bad as you think. More often than not, particularly if you are misquoted or quoted out of context, or it just comes off horribly, the resulting storm will blow over quickly. The current news cycle, in which we are unceasingly inundated with newsfeeds day and night, works to your advantage. Twenty-four hour news means that no sooner do most news items see daylight than they are buried under an avalanche of other news. Chances are, if it is a single quote in a story, it will not garner much attention unless you work to promote it with clients and prospects using social media, putting it on your website, e-mailing it, etc.

If you or your firm are the story, however, you have several options. If the story in question relates to a legal issue, consult with your attorney, but the best course of action is most likely to keep your comments out of the media. Opposing lawyers will almost always find a way to spin your words to their advantage. Fight it out in court, not the press.

Schwab's Bernie Clark put his PR crisis to rest by addressing it head-on.
Schwab’s Bernie Clark put his PR
crisis to rest by addressing it

Don’t try this at home

If, however, we’re not talking about a legal issue but just a negative piece of press coverage, you might attempt to speak to the reporter, using a combination of candor and sound arguments to explain your side of the story. This is risky, as you may indeed say additional wrong things and come off looking worse. Do not attempt a response without professional PR representation.

But take the case of Schwab’s reaction to a blunder it made this summer – contacting clients without properly communicating to advisors. See: Schwab’s rapid response to letter snafu seems to be smoothing ruffled feathers. What did Schwab’s RIA chief, Bernie Clark, do? Bury his head in the sand? Hide out? No, he addressed the issue head-on and admitted a mistake was made. Very smart move.

How to deal with a potential PR crisis

1. Assess the damage Have you been receiving worried comments from your staff, friends and family about the negative piece of coverage? Is this something that if widely read will cause damage to your business? Or is it frustrating, perhaps embarrassing, but not something that will negatively affect your company? Get a PR consultant to do a free analysis if you are not sure.

2. Decide if you can, or should, respond If it is a legal issue, consult your lawyer. But in general it’s probably best to refrain from comment to the media. If there’s misquote, how harmful is the mistake? Is it worth doing battle over? Is the offending coverage just embarrassing, or a real potential threat to your business? A reporter seems to hate you – is it real, or perceived?

3. Accentuate the positive, eliminate the negative Being aggressive with reporters or publications is counterproductive. Focus on what you are doing that is good and interesting. Get the attention of journalists who will talk to you about those things. Focus on getting the message right next time out and amplify the resulting good coverage with social media, your website and e-mail to create a positive online footprint.

Now that I’ve scared the daylights out of you – feel better

Here’s the good news: Even gale-force PR disasters are survivable. Whatever your current crisis, be happy you are not UBS or Netflix. There’s a book waiting to be written on the Netflix’s PR missteps, yet the firm’s chief executive, Reed Hastings, is still in there pitching. “You have to keep trying, you can’t be afraid to make mistakes. Every entrepreneur is about creating change,” he is reported as saying in a article last week. Even Hastings has not given up, and this man has endured one of the worst runaway PR and marketing debacles I’ve ever seen.

As we say to all of our clients, if you choose to do PR, there will be some bumps and bruises along the way. But if you follow a process-driven approach and prepare properly, putting out positive news regularly and contributing meaningfully to the discussion, good things will happen. No one is out to get you – even if it sometimes feels that way. When you choose to publicize yourself, you do need to be careful.

But in the long run, if you are doing some good and have something valuable to talk about with the outside world, PR isn’t scary at all.

Jason Lahita is the Managing Partner at FiComm Partners, LLC, a specialist communications firm that works with advisers and advisory oriented B2B firms to raise their profile, put forth their messages and market their hard-fought credibility.

Mentioned in this article:

FiComm Partners, LLC
Consulting Firm
Top Executive: Jason Lahita

Share your thoughts and opinions with the author or other readers.


Elmer Rich III said:

November 1, 2011 — 11:39 PM UTC

We just saw media research that bad online reviews boost business as much as good ones. Makes sense, any attention is better than none.


Jason Lahita said:

November 2, 2011 — 12:38 AM UTC

Elmer: I would say that depends on who is doing the reviewing. When you do receive a bad review, either by a journalist or customer, take a second to think about how to counter it with something that highlights the good you do rather than get caught up in the moment and make something potentially innocuous worse than it needs to be. Be proactive, not reactive with your media relations and you’ll see good results.


Elmer Rich III said:

November 2, 2011 — 2:57 AM UTC

That’s the intuitive notion but data usually dashes our intuitions — if we pay attention. Mainly we ignore the data and pretend. Human nature.


Elmer Rich III said:

November 2, 2011 — 2:31 PM UTC

“The Streisand effect is a primarily online phenomenon in which an attempt to hide or remove a piece of information has the unintended consequence of publicizing the information more widely.”


Jason Lahita said:

November 2, 2011 — 4:08 PM UTC

Elmer you seem to have a line on some very interesting information. I’d love to see both the media research you reference and also hear more about the “Streisand Effect”, if you want to e-mail me or just put a link to it here. Thanks!


Elmer Rich III said:

November 2, 2011 — 4:31 PM UTC

Yes, we process a lot of research and information. Some we post in our blogs or Google is the source of most of it. Google will turn up most of what we see and some we don’t. Our blogs are:

Financial services marketing:
Geeky science and brain research related to financial services:

Connect on Linked In where we post things as well, most comes out on twitter: @richandcom.

Gravatar said:

June 26, 2014 — 12:52 AM UTC

The brand new MacBook Professionals have the identical Multi-Touch glass trackpad as before, however the line provides a different trick. All of the new MacBook Professionals (such as the 13-inch styles) now have inertial scrolling. Similar to on an apple iphone, iPod touch, or iPad, swipe your finger all the way down to scroll via a lengthy World wide web web site, for instance, plus the momentum carries on the scrolling until finally it step by step dies off. The function appears suitable at your home over the MacBook Professional and may be familiar to anyone who has utilised Apple apple iphone OS devices.

Gravatar said:

June 26, 2014 — 2:23 AM UTC

Bruises from trauma can come about as a consequence of a variety of reasons, which includes falls, incidents and publish-surgical processes. Commonly, report codes 920-924 for bruises secondary to trauma. Say for example a soccer player who had been witnessed with a spouse and children doctor for bruises in just the heel, report 924.20. Preserve in your mind that according to ICD-9, these codes exclude contusions that are incidental to a particular teams of accidents, like crushing accidents, dislocation, fracture, inner accidents, intracranial injuries, nerve accidents, and open up wound.

Submit your comments: